Page 5 - i1052-5173-26-8
P. 5

Figure 1. Virtual rock created with SketchUp and geolocated at collection site, Rheems Quarry, Pennsylvania, USA. Online version can be rotated, and is available
at http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSATG257.S1. ©2016 Google Inc. Image: Landsat. Inset: Photographing hand specimen at arm’s length. Background is irrelevant as
it will be cropped.

images in a KMZ archive. COLLADA (Arnaud and Barnes, 2006)            crossing calcite veins are not identical in shape on either side of                          GSA TODAY | www.geosociety.org/gsatoday
is the format used to display 3D buildings, bridges, etc., on the     the specimen, and they are challenged to visualize the complex 3D
Google Earth terrain, but De Paor and Piñan-Llamas (2006) and         forms in the specimen’s interior, which was the purpose of the
De Paor and Williams (2006) discovered that they could create         exercise in this case.
much larger crustal models that can be made to emerge from the
subsurface (De Paor, 2007) with a slider control (see also Chen et    Ovoid- and Hemi-Cylinder–Shaped COLLADA Models
al., 2008; De Paor and Whitmeyer, 2011; Blenkinsop, 2012; Boggs
et al., 2012; Karabinos, 2013; St. John, 2014).                         A similar approach was taken with ellipsoidal, or ovoid, and
                                                                      hemi-cylindrical specimens, as illustrated by KMZ downloads
Slab-Shaped COLLADA Models                                            accompanying this paper. Six photographs were draped over a
                                                                      model of an ovoidal beach pebble in the ± x, ± y, and ± z direc-
  Consider a rock, which we here define as the verilith (Latin for    tions. To represent cut drill core, cylinders were extruded from
“real rock”) with two parallel sides and minor thickness, such as     circles in SketchUp, then sliced longitudinally, with core photo-
slate, shale, flagstone, or any hand specimen sliced thinly by a      graphs applied as textures. When imported into Google Earth,
rock saw. Figure 1 shows a sample collected from a limestone          such specimens can be made to rise out of the subsurface at their
quarry near Rheems, Pennsylvania, USA (De Paor et al., 1991; De       drill site in response to the slider control. This was done as a
Paor, 2009). Photographs of the flat sides were applied to a rectan-  proof-of-concept by De Paor (2007) and implemented on a large
gular block in SketchUp (Fig. 1 inset) following the method of De     scale using Big Data IODP repositories by St. John (2014).
Paor and Piñan-Llamas (2006; see also De Paor, 2007), and the
later rediscovery of the method by Van Noten (2016). Model            COMPLEX SPECIMENS AND 3D SCANNERS
construction is explained in detail in the GSA Supplemental Data
Repository (see footnote 1), but the process can be summarized as       It is possible to create complex models with SketchUp, but for
the digital equivalent of gluing photographs to plywood and           intricate specimen shapes, 3D scanning is less tedious. A relatively
cutting object outlines with a jigsaw. The Rheems model was           inexpensive NextEngine (2016) scanner was used to model pseu-
exported to Google Earth and placed at its collection site. A KML     dotachylite from Vredefort, South Africa—Earth’s oldest and
file was scripted to make the specimen rotate about a vertical axis   largest known impact structure (De Paor et al., 2010; Fig. 2). Rock
in response to the Google Earth slider. (The COLLADA models in        specimens had been collected during legacy graduate student
the online versions of all figures respond to mouse drags or touch    mapping by Simpson (1978) before the region became a protected
swipes—see the GSA Supplemental Data Repository [footnote 1]).        World Heritage Site. Specimens were retrieved from long-term
In lab class, students can clearly see that the limestone bridges     storage and scanned. Open-source software (MeshLab, 2016)
                                                                      (zBrush is a sophisticated, albeit expensive alternative [Michael,

                                                                                                                                                                   5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10