Page 8 - i1052-5173-28-2
P. 8

Figure 4. Schematic view of a
                                                                                             subduction zone between 35 and
                                                                                             85 km depth based on numerical
                                                                                             model results (and on study of
                                                                                             exhumed/exposed ophiolitic ter-
                                                                                             ranes) showing inferred morphol-
                                                                                             ogies and the detachment of
                                                                                             large folded slices of oceanic
                                                                                             lithosphere, accreted along the
                                                                                             plate interface (from Angiboust
                                                                                             et al., 2012b). This figure also
                                                                                             illustrates the main deformation-
                                                                                             enhanced fluid pathways (associ-
                                                                                             ated with deep serpentinite
                                                                                             producing/consuming reactions),
                                                                                             dominantly at the boundary
                                                                                             between materials with marked
                                                                                             rheological contrasts.

viewing on a computer screen. For com-             aseismic ridges). AGEs: Mike              13. 	 Geochemical and seismological
parison, Big Purple faced strict manuscript        Underwood and Andy Fisher;                     expressions of deep subducted slabs.
length guidelines, authors did their own      3. 	 Forces driving subduction—thermal              AGEs: Catherine Chauvel and
formatting (following the old style of AGU         and geodynamic modeling. AGE:                  Stéphane Rondenay;
journals), resulting in a fairly unpolished        Taras Gerya;
appearance, publication of color graphics     4. 	 Getting started (subduction initiation).  14. 	 Backarc basins, cross chains, and
was expensive (and thus few authors pub-           AGE: Mark Reagan;                              fold-and-thrust belts. AGEs: Fernando
lished color graphics), and we had a strict   5. 	 Outer rise (slab bending, deep hydra-          Martinez and Ron Hyndman;
time deadline in order to keep the book            tion of slabs). AGEs: Doug Wiens,
publication project on schedule (resulting         Cesar Ranero;                             15. 	 Resource implications. AGEs: Gray
in some authors ultimately not submitting     6. 	 Shallow forearc dynamics (initial              Bebout, Bob Stern, and Dave Scholl;
manuscripts). In the end, Big Purple con-          dewatering and diagenesis, fluids,
tained 39 papers, varying greatly in length,       accretion, erosion). AGE: Nathan          16. 	 Crust formation at convergent mar-
with uneven coverage of the full range of          Bangs;                                         gins. AGEs: Kiyoshi Suyehiro and
top-to-bottom subduction science.             7. 	 Deformation of and physical condi-             Kent Condie; and
                                                   tions in the subduction interface from
  For the all-electronic Geosphere themed          the seismogenic zone through the          17. 	 Convergent margin education and
issue, we have identified 17 subduction-           source of episodic slow slip and               outreach. AGE: Bob Stern.
zone science categories, arrayed as a func-        tremor. AGEs: Shuichi Kodaira, Sue
tion of increasing depth in a subduction           Bilek, and Samuel Angiboust;                The Geosphere ST2B-2 themed issue can
zone, beginning with “What Goes In” and       8. 	 Upper plate deformation over varying      be accessed at https://pubs.geoscienceworld
“Forces Driving Subduction.” Each of               timescales. AGEs: Frédérique Leclerc      .org/geosphere/pages/st2b2. It is open to
these science categories has one to three          and Nathalie Feuillet;                    ALL wishing to contribute to this effort.
assistant guest editors (AGEs) assigned to    9. 	 Into the pressure cooker (metamor-        Ideally, papers in the issue will cover each
identifying authors invited to contribute          phism, fluid-rock interactions, records   of the 17 topics, and we are optimistic that
manuscripts and be the contact individuals         of deep underplating and exhumation,      more than 100 papers will ultimately be
for those wanting to submit manuscripts.           nature of deep subduction interface;      published. We anticipate that submissions
The science categories (and the associated         also including arc delamination and       for the ST2B-2 themed issue will be
AGEs) are as follows—at the time of                drips). AGEs: Sarah Penniston-            accepted at the least through the end of
acceptance of this paper, Geosphere                Dorland and Ake Fagereng;                 2018, and we encourage anyone interested
ST2B-2 had amassed ~40 manuscripts in         10. 	 Forearc to subarc mantle wedge. AGEs:    in contributing to contact either one of the
various stages of review, revision, produc-        Maureen Long and Marco Scambelluri;       five guest editors (one of the five of us) or
tion, and publication.                        11. 	 Subduction zone magmatism (models        the AGE(s) associated with the science
                                                   for evolution, petrology, geochemis-      category into which you envision your con-
Outline of ST2B-2 Geosphere Themed                 try, and isotopes, including batho-       tribution fitting.
Issue                                              liths). AGE: Paul Wallace;
                                              12. 	 Explosive volcanism hazards. AGE:        ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1. 	 Introduction;                                 Bob Tilling;
2. 	 What goes in (seafloor lithosphere                                                         We thank Shan de Silva, science editor of
                                                                                             Geosphere, for working with us to plan and
     and sediment, seamounts, and                                                            coordinate the assembly of this themed issue.
                                                                                             Many thanks to reviewer Peter Kelemen for his
                                                                                             constructive input, particularly in the assembly of
                                                                                             the list of “Some Advances in Subduction Zone
                                                                                             Science in the Past 20 Years,” to the other,

8 GSA Today | February 2018
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13