Page 8 - GSATJanuary2020
P. 8

emplaced into the central and eastern Mojave   A  155 Ma           Magmatic arc
          Desert crust (Barth et al., 2008; Needy et al.,                  Sr <0.706 Sr >0.706            x’
                                                                                   i
                                                                            i
          2009; Chapman et al., 2018). Following an   x  Farallon plate                       N. American crust  MSL
          Early Cretaceous lull in arc activity, the sub-                  ~  ~  ~ ~  ~  ~ ~  ~  ~~  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~ ~  ~  ~  50
          SCB root experienced a Late Cretaceous     SOML                              ~ ~  ~    SCML
          pulse of growth associated with increased                                                          100
          magmatism in the SCB (Wells and Hoisch,                                                           150 km
          2008; Needy et al., 2009; Chapman et al.,
          2018), as recorded by ca. 80–70 Ma zircon   B  120 Ma            Magmatic lull in arc
          ages in group 1 and 2 xenoliths. These Late
          Cretaceous additions  to  existing SCB root                                  ~                     MSL
          material and concomitant plutonism at higher   SOML                          ~  ~ ~  ~ ~  ~  ~     50
          levels of the crust likely resulted from delam-                                         SCML       100
          ination and foundering of LC-SCML, desta-                                                         150 km
          bilized by slab shallowing-related lateral
          stresses, and ensuing upwelling of hot asthe-
          nosphere (Leventhal et al., 1995; Wells and   C  75 Ma           Delamination magmatism  Nevadaplano
          Hoisch, 2008).                                                                                     MSL
            Shallow-angle subduction likely com-  Shatsky conjugate
          menced at the plate margin in the ca. 90–75    SOML                                LC-SCML failure   50
                                                                                             and translation
          Ma  time  interval,  based  on  plate  motion                                                      100
          modeling and the timing of schist under-                                                          150 km
          plating (e.g., Grove et al., 2003; Liu et al.,
          2010; Chapman, 2017). The leading edge of
          the shallowly subducting segment  likely   D  65 Ma                       Laramide magmatism
          reached  the  central  Mojave  Desert,  then                                                       MSL
          ~500 km inboard from the margin, no later                                                          50
          than 70 Ma, assuming an orthogonal con-
          verge rate of 100 km/m.y. (Engebretson et                     Imbricated SOML                      100
          al., 1985;  Copeland et  al., 2017). At  this                                                     150 km
          point, schist underplating continued while
          the  slab  shallowed  quickly,  shutting  off   E  20 Ma     Incipient SAf             CV, CC
          magmatism in the SCB, dislodging its                                        Ig.  are-up; MCC  CO Plateau
          LC-SCML, and tectonically bulldozing                                                               MSL
          these materials along the Moho and up to                                                           50
                                                                                                   Arclogite
          ~500 km farther inboard to the Colorado                                                delamination  100
          Plateau transition zone (Axen et al., 2018).                   Imbricated SOML                    150 km
          In the process, strong coupling along the
          subduction  interface  drove  significant
          thickening of foreland crust and the forma-  F  Today           SAf         Basin and Range  SC  CO Plateau
          tion of a vast orogenic plateau (DeCelles,   Paci c plate  ~  ~   ~                                MSL
          2004; Henry et al., 2012; Copeland et al.,            ~  ~  ~ ~  ~ ~  ~  ~  ~~  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~ ~  ~  ~ ~  ~~  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~  ~ ~  ~ ~  ~  ~  ~~  ~  ~  50
          2017; Chapman et al., 2018). (It should be                                                         100
          noted that lower lithosphere is intact NE of                      SOML
          the Colorado Plateau transition zone;                                                             150 km
          hence, deformation along the  Laramide   Figure 4. Cross sections corresponding to x–x' locations in Figure 3. Vertical equals horizontal scale.
          corridor as far inboard as the Black Hills of   Colors correspond to those in Figure 3. See text for details. CC—Camp Creek; CO—Colorado; CV—
                                             Chino Valley; Ig.—ignimbrite; LC—lower crust; MCC—metamorphic core complexes; MSL—mean sea
          South Dakota was likely due to horizontal   level; SAf—San Andreas fault; SC—San Carlos; SCML—sub-continental mantle lithosphere; SOML—
          end-loading, as suggested by Livaccari and   sub-oceanic mantle lithosphere.
          Perry [1993].) Meanwhile, magmatism
          swept inboard, forming ca. 75–55 Ma gra-
          nitic stocks and associated copper mineral-  A LASTING SCAR: CENOZOIC   al., 1988; Erdman et al., 2016). This obser-
          ization in the transition zone (Coney and   DELAMINATION AND EXTENSION   vation  is  readily  explained  by  the  well-
          Reynolds, 1977; Vikre et al., 2014). We   IN THE SW UNITED STATES      documented Eocene to Miocene westward
          suggest that the combination of magma-  Xenolith garnet Sm-Nd and titanite U-Pb   sweep of magmatism  (e.g., Coney and
          tism and crustal thickening–related radio-  ages span the entire Paleogene, indicating   Reynolds, 1977; Copeland et al., 2017),
          genic  heating  precipitated  Latest  Cre-  that displaced arclogite remained hot (>600   including the ca. 25 Ma arclogite xenolith-
          taceous–early Cenozoic  zircon growth in   °C) for tens of millions of years following   hosting latite, that accompanied rollback
          dislodged arclogite.               its dispersal (Dodson, 1973; Esperança et   and tearing of the Farallon slab. This time

         8  GSA Today  |  January 2020
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13