Page 26 - i052-5173-30-9-compressed
P. 26

PENROSE CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
                              The Geological Fingerprints

                                      of Slow Earthquakes


                               Santa Catalina Island, California, USA  |  27 June–1 July 2021
                                                  www.geosociety.org/penrose



         CONVENERS
         James Kirkpatrick, McGill University, Dept. of Earth and Planetary
         Sciences, Montréal, Québec, Canada, james.kirkpatrick@mcgill.ca
         Melodie French, Rice University, Dept. of Earth, Environmental
         and Planetary Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA, mefrench@rice.edu
         John Platt, University of Southern California, Dept of Earth
         Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA, jplatt@usc.edu
         Christie Rowe, McGill University, Dept. of Earth and Planetary
         Sciences, Montréal, Québec, Canada, christie.rowe@mcgill.ca
         David Schmidt, University of Washington, Dept. of Earth and
         Space Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA, dasc@uw.edu

         COSPONSORS                                            Little Harbour, Catalina Island, California, USA. Photo by John Paul Platt.
         The Geological Society of America                      The geological structures that formed during slow earthquakes
         National Science Foundation                           and are preserved in exhumed systems can provide critical
         NSF-GeoPRISMS                                         insights into the sources of slow earthquakes and how they inter-
         Southern California Earthquake Center                 act with the regular earthquake cycle. Although different hypoth-
                                                               eses are proposed on a regular basis in the nascent field of slow
         DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES                            earthquake geology, there is no “smoking gun” evidence of slow
          The discovery of slow earthquakes 20 years ago revolutionized   earthquakes in the rock record. Reconciling the geophysical
         the understanding of how plate motions are accommodated at major   insights with geological observations is therefore an ongoing
         tectonic boundaries. Slow earthquakes are a family of events that   challenge, but it is increasingly clear that only field geological
         include slow slip events (SSE), tectonic tremor, and low frequency   observations on exhumed structures can differentiate between
         earthquakes (LFE). In some systems, SSEs occur together with tec-  models for slow earthquake occurrence, as geodesy and seismol-
         tonic tremor. When these events occur periodically, they are known   ogy cannot resolve the relevant length scales.
         as episodic tremor and slip, or “ETS.” Compared to regular earth-  For this conference, we solicit contributions that use geological
         quakes, the slip across a fault during a slow earthquake occurs   observations, lab measurements, or numerical models to aid in
         slowly, but significantly faster than plate-rate creep. Slow earth-  understanding the physics of slow earthquakes. We encourage
         quakes are observed predominantly near the plate interface of sub-  researchers studying analog systems from any tectonic setting or
         duction zones and on transform plate boundary faults. They are   metamorphic grade relevant to modern tremor and slow earth-
         often associated with “transitional” regions at the edges of seismo-  quakes in order to build a wide range of geological perspectives.
         genic zones but occur both updip and downdip, so encompass a   Contributions that address outstanding questions regarding defor-
         wide range of pressure and temperature conditions. Understanding   mation mechanisms, limits on rates of deformation, and environ-
         slow earthquakes is critical to developing better constraints on   mental conditions are encouraged. New multidisciplinary
         regional seismic hazards and may also provide information on the   approaches are needed to define the physical controls on slow
         physical conditions and fault-loading rates at depth.  earthquakes and to develop new insights into disparate datasets.
          Seismological, geophysical, and geodetic tools have been   For this conference, we aim to stimulate contributions from
         applied extensively to study the range of slow earthquake types,   geological-focused, particularly field-based, investigators and
         where they occur, their relations to each other, and the characteris-  to engage geophysicists with a range of backgrounds to define
         tics that distinguish them from regular earthquakes and creep.   key unknowns and debate possible models.
         However, there are numerous outstanding issues regarding the
         basic processes that control slow earthquake characteristics. For   PRELIMINARY OUTLINE OF THEMATIC SESSIONS
         example, what deformation processes and mechanisms are critical   1. Cutting-edge observations of slow earthquakes;
         to their occurrence? What controls slip rates? Do all faults that   2. Current understanding of the mechanics of slow earthquakes;
         host slow earthquakes share common physical characteristics?    3. Geological perspectives on slow earthquakes;
         Are the multiple potential mechanisms for tremor and slow slip   4. Processes and physical properties of rocks that might be relevant
         common among the different tectonic settings where these phe-  to slow earthquake physics;
         nomena are observed, including subduction zones and continental   5. Key unknowns in slow earthquake physics; and
         transform faults?                                     6. The hypotheses for slow earthquake mechanisms.

         26  GSA Today  |  September 2020
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31