Page 58 - i1052-5173-30-5
P. 58

POSITION STATEMENT DRAFT

                             U.S. Flood Risk Management





          GSA members are invited to submit comments and suggestions   States, climate change is already altering the frequency, intensity,
         regarding the following Position Statement draft by 15 June. Go to   type, and seasonality of intense precipitation events and contribut-
         https://www.geosociety.org/PositionStatements to learn more   ing to sea-level rise. Combined with increases in impervious
         and submit comments.                                  cover, modifications to river floodways and shorelines, and devel-
                                                               opment of flood-prone land, many communities are experiencing
         POSITION SUMMARY                                      flood damages and risk greater than current assessments.
          Across the United States and worldwide, flooding is the deadli-  Not all flood risks are shown on flood maps. In urban areas, for
         est and most costly natural disaster. The rising costs of flooding   example, intense rainfall combined with inadequate storm-water
         largely result from continued development of flood-prone land and   drainage can cause widespread damage [8]. Behind levees, there
         modifications to river and coastal systems, amplified by climate   exists the “residual risk” of failure or levee overtopping even in
         change. By most metrics, the U.S. is losing the fight to manage the   communities with protection adequate for removal from FEMA’s
         nation’s flood risk. Science provides tools for quantifying flood   regulatory floodplain. Many residents in leveed areas are unaware
         risk, estimating future conditions, balancing human uses of flood-  of their residual risk [9]. Similarly, downstream of dams, residual
         plains with ecosystem services, and identifying effective mitiga-  risk is not universally mapped nor widely publicized.
         tion strategies. The Geological Society of America recommends   River and flood science are fundamentally geological sciences.
         policies that move the U.S. toward long-term resilience, focusing   Geoscientists collect data on the characteristics and causes of
         on pathways toward sustainable floodplain management and   flooding using field-based methods, modeling, and remote sens-
         flood-risk reduction.                                 ing. More broadly, geoscientists bring unique perspectives critical
                                                               to understanding, predicting, and mitigating flood hazards, includ-
         RATIONALE                                             ing how nature functions over long time scales and the variability
          Flooding—including the inundation of inland waterways,   and dynamics of natural systems. For example, paleoflood and
         coasts, and urban areas—ranks among the costliest and most    paleoclimate records supplement short instrumental records,
         frequent type of natural disaster in the U.S. and worldwide. The   better predict extreme events, and help to parse out natural and
         economic consequences of flooding are growing rapidly, with   human-caused shifts in flood hazard [10–12].
         floods causing hundreds of billions of dollars in losses in the last
         decade alone [1], displacing communities, and damaging liveli-  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
         hoods. The rising economic and humanitarian costs of flooding   The U.S. has experienced more than 250 weather- and climate-
         are largely the result of continued development in watersheds and   related disasters since 1980, with damages of $1 billion or more
         floodplains and other modifications to river and coastal systems,   (adjusted for inflation), and flooding contributing to nearly 70% of
         amplified by climate change [2].                      these events [13]. By most metrics, the U.S. is losing, not winning,
          Responsibility for managing flood risks across the U.S. spans   the fight to manage the nation’s flood risk. But tools are available
         every level of government (federal, state, local, tribal, territorial)   to chart a more sustainable path for the future. Science provides
         and involves individuals, businesses, and other community stake-  the best possible basis for estimating future conditions, informing
         holders. Under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), the   hazard assessment, balancing human uses of floodplains with eco-
         federal government underwrites insurance for more than 22,000   system services, and identifying effective mitigation strategies
         participating communities in exchange for community adoption   against future damages. Key recommendations are outlined below.
         and enforcement of baseline land-use and construction require-
         ments intended to mitigate losses associated with the base flood   • Move U.S. flood policy toward long-term sustainability,
         (1% annual chance or 100-year flood). As of September 2019,    focusing on pathways to flood-risk reduction and resilience:
         52% of NFIP participating communities have recognized the need   Every disaster provides a window of opportunity to rebuild bet-
         to go beyond the NFIP minimum standards, adopting more strin-  ter. In the face of spiraling losses from flood damages, communities
         gent requirements. Model building codes and standards [e.g., 3]   across the U.S. and worldwide seek solutions to increase their resil-
         require most buildings to be elevated above the NFIP minimum.   ience—the ability to withstand a shock with minimal degradation
         While individual federal agencies have adopted higher standards   and restore function in a reasonable amount of time. Specific poli-
         for planning and projects (e.g., [4]) or as conditions for financial   cies, programs, and resources are needed that move away from
         assistance (e.g., [5]), the base flood currently remains the mini-  rebuilding “just in time for the next disaster” and toward mitigating,
         mum federal flood standard nationwide.                protecting, and adapting to reduce losses long term, improve eco-
          Most current assessments of flood hazard assume that recent   system services, and foster community safety and resilience.
         conditions are representative of the future (i.e., flooding is “sta-
         tionary”), but geoscientists have repeatedly demonstrated that   • Invest in basic river and flood data and research:
         flood hazard is highly sensitive to climatic, geomorphic, and   Flood-risk management and investment decisions, involving
         human-driven change and thus non-stationary [6–7]. In the United   billions, and ultimately trillions of dollars, should be based on

         58  GSA Today  |  May 2020
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63