Page 59 - i1052-5173-30-5
P. 59

more detailed and better hydrologic and climatological data and   adapting to this risk. At the broadest level, students who come from
         science. Great strides in flood assessment have been made—  flood-prone areas—or may move to at-risk areas in the future—
         including high-resolution topography (e.g., lidar) and related    should be aware of flood hazards and ways to address that risk.
         modeling, but basic areas like hydrologic instrumentation lag.   Among advanced students, flooding should be recognized as a geo-
         Investment today in continuing hydrogeoscience data collection   logical hazard alongside earthquakes and slope failures, with spe-
         and analysis translates into flood losses avoided, communities   cific skill sets and tool kits that can be applied to flood manage-
         spared, and lives saved in the future.                ment. Key concepts including hydrology, statistics, GIS, and
                                                               modeling should be taught in the context of flood hazards and man-
         • Incorporate uncertainty and changing conditions in flood   agement, and broader study of infrastructure, finance, planning,
          planning and flood-risk communication:               emergency management, and disaster- and preparedness-related
          Flood hydrology and climate are understood by scientists to be   policy should be encouraged. Geoscience students should recognize
         both stochastic and non-stationary systems—meaning they are   flood-risk and floodplain management as career paths.
         subject to uncertainty and changes over time. But most assess-
         ments of flood risk in the U.S. are communicated as fixed and    • Communicate flood risk and mitigation and resilience strate-
         certain values and lines on maps. Given evidence of shifting flood   gies with the broader public:
         hazard in many locations, risk analyses that assume static condi-  Geoscientists can lead in helping the public understand
         tions may underestimate present-day and future flood risk, some-  the spectrum of threats from flooding, now and looking into
         times significantly. Policy and risk management associated with   the future. The nature of flooding, with recurrence times
         flooding must recognize both uncertainty and past trends while   of decades or centuries between major events, requires a long-
         predicting for future conditions.                     term perspective. Geoscientists are trained to communicate this
                                                               perspective to others. A sunny parcel of riverside land may be
         • Provide the public with actionable flood-risk information,   attractive for a new house or shopping mall, but the substrate may
          including for present and future conditions:         include numerous layers of overbank alluvium documenting a
          Communities need a clearer and more complete picture of their   history of extreme floods. Similarly, historical precipitation data,
         flood risk and what they can do about it. Comprehensive flood-  gage records, and/or downscaled climate models may in some
         risk information is essential to supporting planning, mitigation,   watersheds show long-term trends in flood magnitude, but how-
         and funding and policy priorities. Tools now exist to put such   ever slow, planners would be remiss in calculating future flood
         information into the hands of individual homeowners, renters,    risk assuming static conditions. Tools for managing flood risk in
         and business owners. Existing flood maps should be supplemented   the future include avoiding flood-prone locations [14], mitigating
         with data on residual risks behind levees and downstream of   existing exposure, and adapting to future changes. The key to
         dams, areas with repeated pluvial flooding, and projections of   implementing these strategies is a broad public understanding of
         future conditions resulting from development and climate change.   the nature of the hazard and a public will to use the best available
         Comprehensive flood risk information should drive communica-  science to guide society toward a sustainable and resilient future.
         tions, planning, mitigation actions, policies, and funding priorities
         among all stakeholders.                               • Translate flood data and science into actionable policy
                                                                recommendations:
         • Maximize use of natural systems and processes to mitigate   The Geological Society of America, its membership, and other
          flooding:                                            scientific voices encourage the implementation of balanced, non-
          Wherever possible, development and infrastructure projects   partisan, flood-risk management policies. Geoscientists are poised
         should incorporate non-structural and nature-based approaches to   to be leaders in collaborative efforts with policy makers, planners,
         flood-risk management, including strategies to retain water and   and engineers to improve flood-hazard management and mitiga-
         sediment in uplands and floodplains and to attenuate storm surge   tion. Geoscience offers unique perspectives on a broad range of
         and wave energy in coastal areas. Projects that use natural features   topics relevant to flooding, founded on an appreciation of “deep
         or otherwise mimic natural processes can also provide significant   time” and hydrologic and atmospheric processes that interact with
         co-benefits (e.g., water quality, habitat, cultural, and recreation   Earth’s surface in complex ways over many scales. Geoscience
         opportunities). Wherever possible, infrastructure and development   professionals should help bring the best available science to the
         that degrade these natural protective systems should be avoided.  challenges of flooding, communicating and translating their find-
                                                               ings into tangible products for use by planners, engineers, and
         OPPORTUNITIES FOR GSA AND GSA MEMBERS TO              decision makers. GSA and its members should take opportunities
         HELP IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS                        to reach out to local, state, tribal, and federal leaders to communi-
                                                               cate the relevant science and offer expertise to help improve U.S.
         • Educate the next generation of flood-aware scholars and   flood-risk management.
          citizens:
          Dealing with the challenges of flooding requires a multidisci-  REFERENCES CITED
         plinary understanding of earth systems, hydrology, climate, and   1. U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National
         engineering, with an appreciation of social sciences and policy.   Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), 2020, U.S. Billion-Dollar
         From large introductory classes to specialized graduate seminars,   Weather and Climate Disasters: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/ (last
                                                                accessed 6 Mar. 2020).
         geoscience educators have a role in broadening students’ awareness   2. Winsemius, H.C., Aerts, J.C.J.H., van Beek, L.P.H., Bierkens, M.F.P., Bouwman,
         of flood risk and training them in managing, mitigating, and   A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J.C.J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P.L., van Vuuren, D.P.,
                                                                                       www.geosociety.org/gsatoday  59
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64