Page 6 - i1052-5173-31-10+AR
P. 6

Longitude                           from 240 to 50 °C (Guenthner et al., 2013).
                109°W         108°W         107°W          106°W         105°W
            1  A Mogollon Datil volcanic field  Rio Grande rift   Great Plains  Compiled ZHe dates (Biddle et al., 2018;
                                                                                Gavel, 2019; Reade et al., 2020) show dra-
          Profile parallel  rate (mm/yr)  -1 0  1.45 ± 0.31 nstr/yr  zone  8.54 ± 2.10 nstr/yr  0.68 ± 0.17 nstr/yr  matic differences across the transition zone
                  and Basin and Range
                                                                                with relation to eU (Fig. 3). In the Basin and
            -2
                                                                                all eU values. In contrast, east of and includ-
           800                                                                  Range Province, ZHe dates are consistent for
           700  B  Basin and Range       Rio Grande rift
           600    ZHe Date (n = 118)  transition                                ing the transition zone, ZHe dates have a wide
                                                                                range, where oldest ZHe dates are correlated
           500
          Thermochronologic  Date (Ma)  200  AFT Date (n = 65)  150 ± 174 Ma    highest eU values. This observation suggests
           400
                                                                                with lowest eU and youngest ZHe dates have
                  AHe Date (n = 129)
           300
                                                                                that radiation damage in zircon is a primary
           100
                                                                                control on ZHe dates in this region.
           80
                                                                                  Forward modeling allows for the calcula-
                                                                                tion of ZHe date-eU curves from an input
                    25.4 ± 5.9 Ma
           60
           40
                                                                                of testing the potential effects of reheating
                                                                                during magmatism (see supplemental mate-
           20          26.8 ± 5.7 Ma                               22.2 ± 17.5 Ma  thermal history, and here it provides a means
               20.5 ± 7.2 Ma
                                                                    15.2 ± 8.7 Ma  rial for complete modeling details ). We use a
                                                                                                         1
            0
                2  C                                            basin boundary  general thermal history of southern New
                4  velocity (km/s)                                              Mexico that includes crystallization at 1.6 Ga
                6                                          Tomographic velocity model
                8  234567                                   (Averill and Miller, 2013)  and cooling to 350 °C at 1.45 Ga, based on
               10                  3                               3            40  39
                                                                                  Ar/ Ar muscovite data (Amato et al., 2011),
                    velocity
               20   velocity  2740 kg/m  3   2880 kg/m 3     2700 kg/m  moho    15 °C at 500 Ma based on the age of the over-
                    (km/s)
                    (km/s)
                                2880 kg/m
               30
            Depth (km)  40  6  7  8  3280 kg/m 3  3250 kg/m 3  Anisotropic electrical resistivity  lying Bliss Formation, and maximum reheat-
                                                               Velocity and gravity
                                                              models (Averill, 2007)
               50
                                                                                ing to 150 °C at 80 Ma from accumulation of
              100                                        model oriented perpendicular to  Paleozoic and Mesozoic sediment (Fig. 3A).
                      partial melt                      the rift axis (Feucht et al., 2019)   We include two endmember Proterozoic cool-
                                                            log  (resistivity (Ωm)
              150                                             10                ing histories: multiple cooling pulses during
                                                          0    1     2     3    assembly of Rodinia (path 1; Ricketts et al.,
              200                                                               2021), and multiple pulses of cooling that
                109°W         108°W          107°W         106°W         105°W  coincide with assembly and then breakup of
                                            Longitude
                                                                                Rodinia (path 2; DeLucia et al., 2017).
         Figure 2. E-W cross section across the transition. (A) Global positioning system velocities across the   Resulting ZHe date-eU curves are roughly
         profile line shown in Figure 1 (Murray et al., 2019). (B) Thermochronologic dates for all samples shown
         in Figure 1. Average dates are calculated for each data set in the Basin and Range Province and Rio   similar to observed ZHe dates for the
         Grande rift (±1 standard deviation). (C) Stacked geophysical models for the crust and upper mantle.   southern Rio Grande rift regardless of the
         Note changes in scale with depth. AFT—apatite fission-track; AHe—apatite (U-Th)/He; ZHe—zircon
         (U-Th)/He; nstr/yr—nanostrain/year.                                    Proterozoic cooling history. Boot Heel volca-
                                                                                nic field magmatism in southwestern New
         Magnetotelluric data collected along an   THE THERMAL IMPRINT OF       Mexico occurred from 37 to 26 Ma based on
         E-W transect through southern New Mexico   A BOUNDARY                  40 Ar/ Ar sanidine geochronology (McIntosh
                                                                                    39
         show that the upper mantle is moderately   ZHe  dates  from  the  Basin  and  Range   and Bryan, 2000), and we test the effects of
         resistive (30–100 Ωm; Feucht et al., 2019).   Province (Fig. 2B) largely overlap with ages   this event on ZHe dates (Fig. 3B). Calculated
         The one exception is a zone age conductive   of volcanic rocks in southwestern New   ZHe date-eU curves only match the observed
         material centered on 107.5°W at the eastern   Mexico, suggesting they were likely reset by   data for reheating temperatures of >225  °C
         margin of the transition zone that is excep-  magmatism (Gavel, 2019), and we use these   and indicate that this thermal event did not
         tionally pronounced at depths of 50–100 km   data to model the heating effects of Oligocene   affect ZHe dates in the southern Rio Grande
         and that may also extend to depths >200 km   magmatism in this region. Individual zircon   rift. These results suggest that late Oligocene
         (Fig. 2C). This feature is interpreted to be a   grains from a single sample have variable clo-  magmatism imprinted a major thermal
         zone of lithospheric decompression melting   sure temperatures due to accumulation of   boundary that coincides with independent
         (Feucht et al., 2019). Interestingly, this region   varying amounts of radiation damage that is   geologic and geophysical data sets.
         of decompression melting is slightly asym-  proportional to eU (eU = U + 0.235Th), where
         metric beneath the southern Rio Grande rift   low eU, high He retentivity grains typically   DISCUSSION
         and skewed to the west, as opposed to more   correspond to oldest ZHe dates and high eU,
         symmetric lithospheric thinning and mantle   low retentivity grains yield youngest ZHe   Age and Evolution of the Boundary
         upwelling in central New Mexico (Wilson   dates (Guenthner et al., 2013). These proper-  The collective data sets suggest that the
         et al., 2005).                      ties allow for thermal modeling of ZHe data   southern Rio Grande rift is best explained
         1 Supplemental Material. Full description of zircon (U-Th)/He modeling, inputs, and assumptions. Go to https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAT.S.14794197 to access the supple-
         mental material; contact editing@geosociety.org with any questions.
         6  GSA Today  |  October 2021
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11