Page 24 - i1052-5173-31-12
P. 24

COMMENTARY
                               Reginald Aldworth Daly on

                           ‘much data, but little thinking’




          A.M.C. Şengör, İTÜ Maden Fakültesi, Jeoloji Bölümü ve   In a paper published in 2014 in Geodinamica Acta titled “Outcrops,
         Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü, Ayazağa 34469 Istanbul, Turkey  Isotopic Ages, Terranes and the Undesirable Fate of Tectonic
                                                               Interpretations” (https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2013.858953), I had
          In the 13 Sept. 2021 issue of Nature (v. 597, p. 305), Paul Nurse   complained about the same problem of “much data, little thought.”
         published a very timely warning for biologists titled “Biology must   The superman Daly was hoping for in geology did come from among
         generate ideas as well as data” with the subtitle “Data should be a   his countrymen, when J. Tuzo Wilson (1908–1993) invented the the-
         means to knowledge, not an end in themselves.” When I read it, it   ory of plate tectonics in 1965. It was followed by three decades of
         reminded me of a piece published more than a century ago by the   superb research in geology, but then geology sank back into its paro-
         great Canadian geologist Reginald Aldworth Daly (1871–1957) in the   chial nature, dominated by a craze of data collecting mostly without
         introduction to his Igneous Rocks and Their Origin (1914, p. xxii):   good theories; that activity added much to our knowledge, but not
                                                               much to our understanding of the structure and the history of our
          What geology, like every other science, needs to-day is a frank recogni-  planet. This reminds me of the episode in the twentieth century,
          tion that imaginative thought is not dangerous to science but is the life   which I called elsewhere “the Dark Intermezzo” between 1924,
          blood of science. Even the universities do not fully recognize this fact
          and are notoriously failing to develop the stimuli which are necessary for   when the great genius Émile Argand (1880–1940), the only true heir
          the controlled, scientific imagination. Not only is geology now charac-  to Suess, withdrew from geology and 1965 when Wilson put forward
          terized by rigorous thought; by its nature as a science involving long   the theory of plate tectonics.
          excursions into space—inaccessible places—and time—epochs long   I think all geologists should read Daly’s wise words from more
          passed—geology is peculiarly fitted to stimulate the regulated imagina-  than a century ago and contemplate what went wrong. I think we
          tion, a process at the core of the highest education. Science is built on a
          long succession of mistakes. Their recognition has meant progress.   should ponder whether our education system in geology needs a
          Progress, indefinitely more rapid, will be possible when men of science   reform. Let me end with a quotation from Charles Darwin:
          have more generally lost the fear of making mistakes in using to the   “I am a firm believer, that without speculation there is no good
          uttermost their powers of correlation and deduction. Science is drowning   & original observation” (Darwin to Wallace, 22nd Dec. 1857;
          in facts. It can only be rescued by the growth of systems of thought.   see Burkhardt and Smith, editors, 1990, The Correspondence of
          Better than none are “little systems” that “have their day and cease to
          be.” We can hope that geology, like every other science, will find its   Charles Darwin. Volume 6: 1856–1857: Cambridge, Cambridge
          superman who shall show us the building hidden behind the scaffolding   University Press, 1990, p. 35).
          of myriad isolated facts of nature. Meantime, it is the duty of every
          worker in science to strive for a complete mental system in his field of   FURTHER READING
          research and, however mistaken he may be, he should have the special   Şengör, A.M.C., 2019, Observations: what for?: Canadian Journal of Earth
          sympathy of fellows. The best sympathy is expressed in constructive   Sciences, v. 56, p. xi–xiv.
          criticism. The “facts” of to-day are the hypotheses of yesterday.




































         24  GSA Today  |  December 2021
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29