Page 22 - i1052-5173-31-12
P. 22

Old or Young? The Topographic

                           Evolution of the Sierra Nevada




                                           Reno, Nevada, USA | 20–27 June 2022


         LEADERS                                               of the old continental root through either lithospheric foundering
         Elizabeth Cassel, University of Idaho, Dept. of Geological   or normal faulting.
         Sciences, Moscow, Idaho, USA                           This Field Forum will focus on disputed geologic features
         Chris Henry, University of Nevada Reno, Mackay School of   across much of the northern part of the Sierra Nevada that com-
         Mines, Reno, Nevada, USA                              prise the observational basis for the range of uplift and elevation
         Craig Jones, University of Colorado, Dept. of Geological   estimates. We will consider observations and inferences from a
         Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, USA                      broad range of specialties that have been employed to address
         John Wakabayaski, California State University, Dept. of Earth   this problem.
         and Environmental Sciences, Fresno, California, USA    We will visit key locales that illustrate the following features:
                                                               1. Early Tertiary rocks cropping out deep in modern canyons,
         “Youth is the gift of nature, but age is a work of art.” —Stanislaw Jerzy Lec  suggesting that most Sierra erosion is mere reoccupation of
                                                                ancient canyons.
         DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES                            2. The distribution of Paleogene relief and its relationship to post-
          After more than 150 years of geological investigation, the topo-  Miocene incision.
         graphic history of the Sierra Nevada remains contentious. Is the   3. The nature and integration of the Eocene rivers that deposited
         range the remains of a greater Sierra from the Cretaceous? Is the   the “Auriferous Gravels” of the ‘49er Gold Rush, including
         range a phoenix, rising from the debris of an earlier range? These   channel gradients and sedimentary features.
         end-member conceptualizations have important implications that   4. Depositional ages of the “Auriferous Gravels”: Do they repre-
         extend well beyond the Sierra to the history of orogens in places   sent many millions of years of accumulation, or was deposition
         like the Andes and the Tibetan Plateau.                fairly short-lived?
          If the range is old, then erosion has been a minimal force through   5. Evidence for and against tilting and how younger faulting might
         much of the Cenozoic. West-flowing rivers deeply incised into bed-  contaminate inferences.
         rock below older Cenozoic rocks would reflect a changing climate   6. Evidence of relationships between weathering and erosion rates
         with only minimal removal of pre-Cenozoic material, an inference   and the various controlling factors.
         consistent with low post-Cretaceous exhumation and minimal total   Additional discussions addressing observations not directly
         unroofing recorded by thermochronology. Variations in the modern   associated with outcrops will occur as relevant in the field and in
         gradients of Eocene channels with azimuth would be the product of   evening sessions.
         bedrock anisotropy or a complex depositional history in a disequi-
         librium system that would mean that river gradients are more com-  AGENDA
         plex than most geomorphic models assume. In this case, geophysi-  This incredible seven-day Field Forum will originate in Reno,
         cal observations of a relatively thin crust and buoyant mantle under   Nevada, USA, and then travel across the range to visit locales in
         the eastern half of the range suggest that such changes since the   the northern Sierra for four days from a base in Grass Valley in
         Miocene have had a minimal topographic impact, indicating that an   the Sierra foothills. The group will then tour outcrops to the south
         older crustal root was effectively replaced by buoyant mantle with   from a two-night stay in Modesto after which we will return to
         little net change in elevation.                       Reno. Weather in June in this area is generally dry with tempera-
          If the range is young, we have a significant issue with our inter-  tures from pleasant to warm or hot at lower elevations during the
         pretations of several globally applied paleoelevation proxies. The   days. Most outcrops will be near vehicles, with a few requiring a
         geometry of the elevated interior of the U.S. Cordillera would   bit of bushwhacking. Plans also include two optional hikes of up
         seem far different than an Altiplano-like landscape if the western   to one mile.
         edge was lower than at present. The failure of the mountains to
         rebound as erosion unloaded them would suggest some destruc-  Day 1 (20 June): Arrival (by 11 a.m.) and introduction to early
         tion of buoyancy through the early Cenozoic. A range that recently   Cenozoic channels and paleocanyons and Eocene–Oligocene sed-
         increased its mean elevation would demand a mechanism only   imentary and igneous fill (Dogskin Mountain and Haskell Peak).
         loosely tied to modern plate interactions, either by straight thermal   Day 2 (21 June): Paleorelief and modern relief near the Sierra crest
         warming as a subducting slab was removed or by physical removal   (Donner Summit, Royal Gorge area, Emigrant Gap).

         22  GSA Today  |  December 2021
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27