Page 8 - gt1511
P. 8
Figure 4. Much simplified reconstruction of
margin just prior to northward migration
illustrating continuity of Late Cretaceous–Early
Tertiary magmatic belt. The sinuous shape of
the magmatic belt reflects the shape of the
southwestern margin of North America
immediately after terminal collision of the
Cordilleran Ribbon Continent.
GSA TODAY | NOVEMBER 2015 Cordilleran fold-thrust belt terminates just southwest of Las Vegas exhumation located farther west in or adjacent to the magmatic
and to the south resumes ~800 km farther east, as noted by King belt. The deformation, magmatism, and exhumation are well
(1969). South of the zone, terranes collided with North America known throughout the Transverse Ranges and Mojave Desert
much farther east than to the north, but the overall geology is region of Southern California and Arizona (Haxel et al., 1984;
similar in many respects simply because some of the same events May, 1989; Needy et al., 2009), as well as in the Cascades and
took place on both sectors of the continental margin. Others, such as Coast plutonic complex of British Columbia and the Yukon
deformational features related to the 125–110 Ma Sevier event, have (Miller et al., 2009; Rusmore and Woodsworth, 1991; Parrish,
no recognized counterpart to the south because the impinging 1992; Evenchik et al., 2007; Johnston and Canil, 2007).
block, which Stephen Johnston and I (Johnston, 2008; Hildebrand,
2013) argued to have been a ribbon continent, did not arrive there Overall, the proposed reconstruction resolves many long-
until much later, as suggested by the coincidence of the distinctive standing issues in Cordilleran geology and hints at solutions to
eastward-extending prong of the mantle fast-zone (Sigloch and many more. Not only are the paleomagnetic data accounted for,
Mihalynuk, 2013), and the meridionally restored location of the and the Baja-BC controversy resolved, but the currently dismem-
Great Basin region, at about 125 Ma (Hildebrand, 2014). bered Laramide magmatic, deformational, and metamorphic
collisional belt is reunited and validates the reconstruction.
A major Late Cretaceous–Paleocene magmatic belt, interpreted Hopefully, this initial first-order model will lead others to work
by Hildebrand (2013) to represent Laramide slab failure magma- backward through time to better understand the development of
tism and metallogenesis, extends from Alaska to just south of the the Cordilleran orogen. Many more surprises are yet to come.
Lewis & Clark transverse zone and from southern Mexico to the
Transverse Ranges (Figs. 1 and 2). It provides another robust CONCLUSIONS
piercing point. The present-day magmatic gap in between the
two was perhaps the most important reason to ascribe Laramide 1. Similar relationships of well-dated and mapped units along
thick-skinned deformation to flat-slab subduction (Dickinson and both sides of the Lewis & Clark zone and the Texas Lineament
Snyder, 1978; Humphreys, 2009), but by reuniting the transverse suggest that the two features were formerly continuous.
zones, the two belts of Laramide magmatism and their related
porphyry copper deposits are joined, obliterating the magmatic 2. By restoring 1300 km of dextral slip along the Cordilleran
gap and validating the overall reconstruction (Fig. 4). fold-thrust belt—about the minimum indicated from paleo-
magnetic data—the Lewis & Clark transverse zone and the
It is worth noting that the Laramide magmatic belt has exhu- Texas Lineament are aligned into a continuous structure. The
mation ages of 70–50 Ma over its entire length (Miller and reconstruction is simple and clarifies many relationships that
Morton, 1980; Wells and Hoisch, 2008; Miller et al., 2009; were previously difficult to explain.
Armstrong, 1988) and that there are two bands of Laramide
deformation: the better known band, mostly without proximal 3. In the reconstruction (Fig. 4), the Laramide collision zone and
magmatism, located in the eastern Cordillera, and another with its exhumed upper-plate slab-failure rocks occur in a contin-
associated high-grade metamorphism and generally rapid uous band from southern Mexico through the Transverse
Ranges into the Cascades and Coast plutonic complex. Thus,
there was no magmatic gap during the Laramide.
8