Page 38 - i1052-5173-32-10_FY22_new
P. 38

PENROSE REPORT
              Geological Fingerprints of Slow Earthquakes


                                          Santa Catalina Island, California, USA
                                                       1–5 April 2022


         CONVENERS                                             coupling between metamorphic and structural processes, the
         James Kirkpatrick, McGill University, Dept. of Earth and   importance of mechanical heterogeneity during deformation, and
         Planetary Sciences, Montréal, Québec, Canada, james.kirkpatrick@  the rates at which veining/fracture and distributed deformation
         mcgill.ca                                             occur. In the Catalina Amphibolite Unit, blocks of mafic and
         John Platt, University of Southern California, Dept. of Earth   ultramafic rocks in a metasomatized matrix attested to fluid-rock
         Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA                interaction and the accompanying progressive changes in rock
         David Schmidt, University of Washington, Dept. of Earth and   rheology leading to mechanical heterogeneity.
         Space Sciences, Seattle, Washington, USA               The keynote presentations emphasized that the well-resolved
         Melodie French, Rice University, Dept. of Earth, Environmental   source parameters of slow earthquakes (e.g., ~10  m/s slip rate,
                                                                                                    –7
         and Planetary Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA           km/day rupture propagation rate, and ~10 kPa stress drop for
         Christie Rowe, McGill University, Dept. of Earth and Planetary   SSEs) are distinct from regular earthquakes. Furthermore, to first
         Sciences, Montréal, Québec, Canada                    order the geodetic and seismic records of slow earthquakes appear
                                                               to be similar, regardless of tectonic setting or depth of the slip
         INTRODUCTION                                          event. A broadly held view was that because the SSEs accommo-
          This Penrose Conference assembled a multidisciplinary group of   date substantially more of the plate motion budget and exhibit
         scientists to debate how geological evidence can contribute toward   much larger seismic moments than LFEs, SSEs are the dominant
         understanding why slow earthquakes occur and to explain their   member of the slow earthquake family and should be the focus of
         characteristics. Slow earthquakes are a family of fault and shear   future efforts to understand the physics of slow slip. However,
         zone slip events that include slow slip events (SSEs), tectonic   some participants argued that the LFE components of SSE were
         tremor, and low frequency earthquakes (LFEs). In some systems   the best-resolved geophysically and should be instrumental in
         these different events occur together, and they are known as epi-  driving more specific comparisons to geologic features. The
         sodic tremor and slip, or “ETS.” Compared to earthquakes, the slip   breakout discussions therefore explored the significance of exist-
         across a fault during a slow earthquake occurs slowly, but signifi-  ing geological observations and the future research needs from
         cantly faster than plate-rate creep. Slow earthquakes are widely   geological work in two themes:
         observed where geophysical networks are robust, contribute signifi-
         cantly to the overall slip budget in portions of some plate boundary   1. Is there any process, condition, or structure common to slow
         faults, and may elucidate stress transfer between portions of plate   earthquakes that could explain their characteristics?
         boundaries with different modes of fault slip. Understanding slow   The consistent geodetic and seismological characteristics of slow
         earthquakes is therefore critical to better constrain regional seismic   slip suggest there may be a common process or set of conditions at
         hazards and may also constrain the physical conditions and fault-  the sources of SSEs and possibly another for tectonic tremor and
         loading rates at depth.                               LFEs. Attendees debated if and how grain-scale deformation mech-
          The conference was held on 1–5 April 2022 at the University of   anisms, deformation structure geometry, and deformation condi-
         Southern California Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies   tions (e.g., effective pressure, temperature, etc.) could be different
         on Pimu (Santa Catalina Island), California, USA, where the   across the range of slow earthquake occurrences but combine to
         exceptional exposures and structural complexity of the Catalina   yield similar slip phenomena. A combination of deformation mecha-
         Schist provided inspiration for the discussions. Forty-seven attend-  nisms involving frictional sliding plus some viscous-type mecha-
         ees, including ~45% early-career scientists, traveled from eight   nism likely promotes slow earthquakes. Further work is needed to
         different countries, including Canada, Germany, Japan, Italy, the   determine how the two mechanisms interact and are preserved in
         Netherlands, New Zealand, and the UK. The meeting launched   the rock record, recognizing that both the interactions and the pres-
         with a series of keynote talks presenting cutting-edge perspectives   ervation may vary between different SSE settings. Attendees agreed
         on slow earthquakes from seismological, geodetic, experimental,   that geological field observations from slow earthquake source
         modeling, and geological communities. The subsequent breakout   depths indicate the deformation associated with these events likely
         discussion sessions and poster sessions were devoted to research   affects a volume rather than a planar or quasi-planar surface, which
         presentations from the participants, framing relevant hypotheses   is also allowed by the geophysical constraints. Heterogeneity is
         that explain slow earthquakes and debating how geological evi-  ubiquitous, but further work is needed to determine what structures
         dence can be leveraged to test those hypotheses.      or rheological contrasts are relevant to slow slip, and how slow
          A day-long field trip informed much of the meeting discussions,   slip can propagate over long distances despite the heterogeneity.
         with participants taking in exposures of the Catalina Schist that   Although slow slip phenomena occur over a broad range of meta-
         were metamorphosed and deformed under conditions similar to   morphic conditions, attendees noted that low effective stresses pro-
         where some slow earthquakes occur today. Exposures included a   mote slow slip by driving slip toward frictionally neutral stability,
         mélange and a sheeted vein complex in the Catalina Blueschist   though low effective stresses alone cannot explain why slow slip
         Unit, which focused attention on pore pressure constraints,   occurs rather than regular earthquakes. More detailed analyses of

         38  GSA TODAY  |  October 2022
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43