Page 44 - i1052-5173-32-9
P. 44

Soliciting Community Input on Culture

                                  and Ethics of Geologic Sampling





         Marjorie A. Chan, Dept. of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA; David W. Mogk, Dept. of Earth
         Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA

         ETHICS OF SAMPLING                  heritage II workshop proceedings [National   and our personal responsibilities as scientists
          It is common for earth scientists to collect   Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and   and citizens for stewardship of Earth, its
         samples from a wide range of environments   Medicine et al., 2021]). Furthermore, there is   resources, and its people.
         and settings as a routine part of our work.   a growing body of literature and commen-
         Samples may include a range of earth and   tary on the broader field of geoethics (e.g.,   GSA’S ROLE IN EVALUATING ETHICS
         planetary materials such as rocks, minerals,   Di Capua et al., 2021) that embraces our   Community input is needed to find a path
         fossils, soils/sediments, meteorites, and natu-  responsibility to protect our geoheritage.  forward for our professional societies to influ-
         ral fluids, and comprise the full range of sizes,   The  ethics  of  geological  sampling  is  a   ence sampling practices. Thus, the purpose of
         from large dinosaur bones to microscopic fos-  long-standing issue because there is an   this short paper is to (1) raise awareness about
         sils. In our Anthropocene age of increasing   increased international awareness of the   the ethics of sampling, and (2) offer the oppor-
         world populations, decreased accessibility to   need to protect and preserve iconic geologic   tunity for the GSA membership, and geosci-
         field sites, shrinking resources, more sensitiv-  sites  for  future generations (e.g.,  through   entists at-large, to provide input on our current
         ity to cultural Indigenous areas, and unprece-  geoheritage initiatives such as the UNESCO   culture of sampling through two venues—
         dented pressures on unique geoheritage sites,   Global Geopark Network, the International   an online survey to collect data about geosci-
         the ethics of sampling is important to all geo-  Union of Geological Sciences [IUGS]   entists’ attitudes and practices, and an inter-
         scientists. The provenance of samples that   International Commission on Geoheritage,   active Noontime Lecture  forum at GSA
         support our research—where they came from,   and the International Union for Conservation   Connects 2022 in Denver, Colorado, USA.
         how they were collected, terms of permission   of Nature  [IUCN] World Commission on   We are soliciting the input of geoscientists
         for access and use, and their ultimate fate in   Protected Areas Geoheritage Specialist   from diverse backgrounds and experience,
         archives or disposal—really do matter (e.g.,   Group, to identify classical geosites). Not-  and at all career stages from interested stu-
         Planavsky et al., 2020). As a discipline, we   withstanding these international programs to   dents to experienced professionals, to obtain
         need to examine: What is our culture of sam-  identify and preserve classic geologic sites,   the  broadest  representation of  perspectives
         pling? Do we, or should we, have established   rock outcrops are being irreversibly dam-  and attitudes to evaluate the existing culture
         guidelines or standard sampling codes we   aged (Fig. 1) due to indiscriminate sampling   of geologic sampling. The survey and interac-
         abide by (e.g.,  Nature Geoscience, 2021)?   in  the  name  of  science  (e.g.,  MacFadyen,   tive forum build on liaisons with the American
         Should we teach sampling ethics to our stu-  2010; Druguet et al, 2013; Butler, 2015; Chan   Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Town Hall
         dents as part of our training of the next gen-  and Kamola, 2017; Foss, 2019; Di Capua et   on geological sampling convened at their 2021
         erations of geoscientists? Ethics examine the   al., 2022). In addition, many geologic sites   Fall Meeting.
         moral principles that affect both our personal   also hold significant cultural and spiritual
         and professional behavior, and the ethics of   value for Indigenous people, landowners,   SURVEY—OPEN TO ALL
         sampling may reveal conflicting values with   and local communities, and there is a need   GEOSCIENTISTS
         personal,  professional, environmental, and   to minimize the impacts of sampling activi-  We invite all GSA members as well as
         societal implications.              ties or marking outcrops. It is increasingly   allied professional society members to par-
          Over the past half century, the rising   important for geoscientists to examine the   ticipate in a pre-meeting survey with the
         international geoconservation movement   ethics of our communal sampling practices,   purpose of collecting information to better
         has  recognized that special geological fea-
         tures need to be protected and managed as                                            Figure 1. This pre-2017 exam-
         part of our geoheritage.  The  Geological                                            ple of geovandalism (sam-
         Society  of  America  (GSA)  Position                                                pling without a permit), shown
                                                                                              by  paleomagnetic drill holes
         Statement on Geoheritage defines “sites or                                           (red arrows), is a reminder of
         areas of geologic features with significant                                          exceptionally poor judgement
                                                                                              that left a scarred arch-aeo-
         scientific, educational, cultural, and/or aes-                                       logical petroglyph  site on a
         thetic value,” which are key to advancing                                            Miocene tuff, Nevada, USA.
                                                                                              What personal or professional
         knowledge and support the broad under-                                               values guided the decision to
         standing of the environment, its geodiversity                                        sample  here?  What  are  the
                                                                                              consequences? What infor-
         and biodiversity, and the factors that influ-                                        mation or training could have
         ence climate change (see America’s Geo-                                              led to better decision-making?
                                                                                              Image credit: S. Foss.
         GSA Today, v. 32, https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG542GW.1. CC-BY-NC.

         44  GSA TODAY  |  September 2022
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48