Page 27 - i1052-5173-28-8
P. 27

Table 1. Demographic data collected from REU* participants from 2012–2017

                      No. students Age range >25 years old             Parents                 No. of students who consider

                      (%) (avg.)                            (%)        (%) place important (%)

All REU participants  98                        18–54 (26)  31 (32%)   26 (27%)                  49 (50%)

Native American       41 19–54 (29)                         25         22                        27

REU participants (42% of total)                             (61% of Native (54% of Native (66% of Native students)

                                                            students)  students)

*REU—Research Experience for Undergraduates.

findings occurs at different levels—locally     important and interrelated place, commu-       place-based and community-based partici-
to tribal governments as well as nationally.    nity, and family were for Native American      patory research, and all mentors and partici-
                                                students in particular. In interviews, stu-    pants are trained in this approach. The hope
SUCCESS OF THE SLAWR MODEL                      dents noted that while it was difficult to     is that this experience will prepare Native
AND LESSONS LEARNED                             balance family responsibilities with the       Americans to fill resource management
                                                responsibilities required of the REU, accom-   positions and prepare the next generation of
  Data collected from participants (Table 1)    modations for family made it possible to       researchers in best practices for doing
highlight the importance of place and com-      participate in the project when they would     research on tribal lands.
munity for Native American participants.        not have otherwise been able. Leaders also
When project evaluators asked students if       responded to student feedback indicating       ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
the location of the REU site influenced par-    needed clarity on how or why their projects
ticipation in the summer program, about half    were community-based because planning             The REU projects are currently funded by the
said “yes,” which was not necessarily sur-      occurred before the students arrived onsite.   National Science Foundation EAR 1461006, and
prising. What was surprising were responses     In response, the leaders made the connec-      were funded by 2012–2014 NSF EAR 1420467 and
that students provided to the open-ended        tions with the projects and local communi-     2011–2012 NSF EAR 1156984.
question of why place mattered. A thematic      ties more explicit and included more CBPR
content analysis of all responses from Native   material as part of orientation.               REFERENCES CITED
American students revealed that the major-
ity listed family responsibilities (36%) and    NEXT STEPS                                     Dalbotten, D., Haacker-Santos, R., and Zurn-
being close to home (28%) as reasons they                                                         Birkhimer, S., 2014, New voices: The role of
selected and applied for the REU-SLAWR.           The REU-SLAWR completed its sixth               undergraduate geoscience research in supporting
Others noted interest in the unique land-       season and continues to refine its model to       alternative perspectives on the Anthropocene,
scape of the area (14%), the place-based        best support the needs of the diverse stu-        in Dalbotten, D., Roehrig, G., and Hamilton, P.,
nature of the research projects (14%), and      dents who participate each year. In addition      eds., Future Earth—Advancing Civic Under-
working in Native communities (8%) as fac-      to annual project evaluation, the project         standing of the Anthropocene: New York, John
tors that played into their decision to apply.  leaders are planning to conduct a longitudi-      Wiley & Sons, p. 77–88.
In comparison, non-Native students who          nal analysis of student data collected since
indicated that place was important identified   the start of the REU to identify the most      Haacker, R., 2015, From recruitment to retention:
the landscape/geography and field-based         influential model elements that recruit, sup-     Nature Geoscience, v. 8, p. 577–578, https://
research topics as reasons why they applied     port, and retain students from underrepre-        www.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2501.
to the REU, with far fewer noting family        sented groups in the geosciences. These
responsibilities or proximity to their home as  essential elements can be used as a model      Huntoon, J.E., Tanenbaum, C., and Hodges, J.,
reasons they decided to participate.            for other REUs who wish to broaden partici-       2015, Increasing diversity in the geosciences:
                                                pation in the geosciences.                        Eos, v. 96, 9 March 2015, doi:10.1029/
  These responses to the importance of                                                            2015EO025897, https://eos.org/project-updates/
location were different than expected, but        The REU-SLAWR is developing new                 increasing-diversity-in-the-geosciences (last
understandable given that the Native            approaches to undergraduate research that         accessed 17 May 2018).
American REU-SLAWR students were, on            focus on place-based projects that are rel-
average, slightly older and made up the         evant to students and their communities.       Kober, N., 2015, Reaching Students: What Research
majority of the participants with children      A few of the things that the REU-SLAWR            Says about Effective Instruction in Undergraduate
(85%). The data from participants suggest       does to support diversity in the program          Science and Engineering: Washington, D.C.,
that physical proximity of the REU site to      include: (1) ensure that students have a          National Academies Press, 256 p.
their homes helped facilitate Native stu-       paycheck the day they arrive; (2) encour-
dent participation by allowing participants     age students to let the leaders know if they   National Science Foundation, National Center for
to meet their family obligations while also     have any cultural events (e.g., powwow) or        Science and Engineering Statistics, 2017, Women,
gaining research experience. That research      other issues and make allowance for these         Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Sci-
topics were locally relevant was also an        things; (3) value and incorporate tradi-          ence and Engineering: 2017: Arlington, Virginia,
important draw as participants were aware       tional knowledge and cultural information         Special Report NSF 17-310, http://www.nsf.gov/
that their research findings would directly     and encourage students to share it; and           statistics/wmpd/ (last accessed 24 May 2018).
impact their home communities in which          (4) put students on teams and emphasize
the research was conducted.                     teamwork over individual success.              Singer, S., Nielsen, N., and Schweingruber, H.,
                                                                                                  editors, 2012, Discipline-Based Education
  As the project evolved, student feedback        The REU-SLAWR offers a new paradigm             Research: Understanding and Improving Learn-
helped REU leaders appreciate how               for undergraduate research that incorporates      ing in Undergraduate Science and Engineering:
                                                                                                  Washington, D.C., National Research Council,
                                                      www.geosociety.org/gsatoday                 National Academies Press, 282 p.

                                                                                               Manuscript received 19 Oct. 2017
                                                                                               Revised manuscript received 9 May 2018
                                                                                               Manuscript accepted 11 May 2018

                                                                                                                                                     27
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32