Page 21 - i1052-5173-29-3-4
P. 21

Left: Field Forum participants pose on rocks of the Western Metamorphic Belt. Right: Lincoln Hollister imparts his enthusiasm about rocks in the
          Coast Mountains batholith. Photos by Chris Mattinson.

          juxtaposes high-grade metamorphic rocks of the Central Gneiss   Central Gneiss Complex. The structural and tectonic framework
          Complex with greenschist facies rocks of Stikinia. Higher in the   for this event is not well understood. Thrust faulting likely played
          detachment system, rocks within Stikinia are cut by both high-   a significant role, especially within the Central Gneiss Complex,
          and low-angle normal faults. Evidence of this extensional fault-  but its cause and relation to proposed strike-slip faulting remains
          ing is largely lacking in areas to the north and south. Forum par-  uncertain. Similarly, whether the prominent crustal break
          ticipants examined the main elements of this complex orogen   currently marked by the 65–55 Ma Coast shear zone was the locus
          and participated in lively discussion of existing models, funda-  of older strike-slip faulting is unknown. The final stage of
          mental questions regarding batholith growth in general, and the   batholith construction at this latitude was marked by crustal
          central Coast Mountains batholith in particular, and directions   extension in the early Tertiary; the apparent lack of this crustal
          for future work. Some of these thoughts are summarized in the   collapse along strike in the batholith leaves open questions
          following section and may help guide future researchers to use   regarding the significance of extension in batholith evolution, the
          the Coast Mountains batholith to address key questions about   driving forces of extension, and the tectonic framework of the
          crustal evolution at convergent margins.             Coast Mountains batholith in early Tertiary time.
                                                               3. What are the causal relationships between magma generation,
          QUESTIONS ABOUT BATHOLITH GROWTH                      deformation, and metamorphism?
          AND EVOLUTION                                         Voluminous plutons in the Coast Mountains result in limited
            Batholiths are the exhumed roots of magmatic arcs and contain   preservation of metamorphic rocks. Thus, it is difficult to evaluate
          evidence of the processes that form continental crust. These pro-  whether metamorphism resulted in partial melting or played a less
          cesses and those related to batholith evolution continue to pose   direct role in HFE. Geochronologic data indicate that some meta-
          several problems in modern geology. Some of these questions,   morphism was synchronous with ca. 80 Ma HFE within the Coast
          discussed during the forum, follow.                  Mountains batholith. Lu-Hf garnet ages of >100 Ma in the
          1. What are the processes and conditions responsible for the   Western Metamorphic Belt (Wolf et al., 2010) indicate that the
            observed temporal and spatial variations in magmatism?  earliest metamorphism along the western flank of the Coast
            Gehrels et al. (2009) and Cecil et al. (2018) document the timing   Mountains batholith preceded HFE. Additional studies are needed
          of intrusion along more than 1000 km of the Coast Mountains   to better document the timing of metamorphism within and adja-
          batholith. The data demonstrate both the across-strike variation   cent to the Coast Mountains batholith and to integrate these events
          and the episodic nature of magmatism. In addition, Cecil et al.   with the structural and tectonics evolution of the batholith.
          (2018) document that brief high flux events (HFE) vary tempo-  4. What is the contribution of sediments to magmatism?
          rally along the strike of the Coast Mountains batholith. Future   The limited preservation of metamorphic rocks also makes
          work is needed to associate these HFE with specific crustal and   evaluation of sediment contributions to magma generation dif-
          mantle processes.                                    ficult. Thus, possible relamination of sediments to the base of
          2. What processes are responsible for the structural framework   the crust may only be evaluated through isotopic and trace
            of the Coast Mountains batholith during batholith growth, and   element signatures.
            how did these processes affect magmatism?          5. What drives magma generation at mid to lower crustal levels
            Late Cretaceous crustal thickening is best demonstrated by   (e.g., Kasiks Sill)?
          metamorphic P-T-t paths from the Western Metamorphic Belt   Plutons within the Central Gneiss Complex contain evidence for
          along the western flank of the Coast Mountains batholith and the
                                                                                               Continued next page…
                                                                                       www.geosociety.org/gsatoday  21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26