Page 51 - i1052-5173-32-5
P. 51

his outrageous hypothesis. Second, and just prior to the paper sub-
                                                               mission to the Journal of Geology, he was named to the editorial
                                                               board of that journal.
                                                                Although the “Spokane Flood Debate” would rage on for sev-
                                                               eral decades, Bretz largely abandoned the scabland scene after
                                                               his decade of intensive fieldwork. He trusted that a resolution of
                                                               the controversy would eventually be found when others devoted
                                                               appropriate field investigations to the problem. Beginning in
                                                               1933, Bretz initiated new lines of research, beginning with gla-
                                                               cial studies as a member of the Louise A. Boyd Expedition to
                                                               East Greenland. From 1938 to 1961, Bretz devoted considerable
                                                               research to the origin of limestone caverns. His cave studies in
                                                               17 states, Mexico, and Bermuda placed physical speleology on a
                                                               firm scientific basis, and his insights and energy were important
                                                               to the late twentieth-century resurgence of karst geomorphic and
         Bretz (on left) with University of Chicago geology graduate students stand-  hydrologic studies in the United States.
         ing in front of a Model T that was provided by Thomas Lodge for the field   Resolution of the Channeled Scabland controversy came gradu-
         seasons of 1923 and 1924. (Photograph provided by Lodge’s grandson,
         Brian McDonald.)                                      ally, initially with the documentation by Joseph Thomas Pardee
                                                               (1871–1960) of ice-dammed Pleistocene glacial Lake Missoula in
         assemblage of landforms that included coulees, immense dry cata-  western Montana as a plausible source for the scabland mega-
         racts, rock basins, anastomosing channel ways, and gravel bars.   flooding. Eventually the accumulating field evidence became
         Field relations among these features, most notably the multiple   overwhelming, particularly when Bretz and others synthesized
         levels of divide crossings, led Bretz to propose that an immense   new data obtained by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Columbia
         cataclysmic flood had swept across the Columbia Plateau in late   Basin Irrigation Project in the 1950s. Especially important for
         Pleistocene time, creating the great plexus of channel ways that he   convincing skeptics was the discovery that giant current ripples
         named the “Channeled Scabland.”                       (gravel dunes) cap many of the scabland gravel mounds that Bretz
          In a 1923 paper, Bretz concluded, “It was a debacle which swept   had noted in the 1920s to be immense river bars. By the late 1960s
         the Columbia Plateau.” He named this debacle the “Spokane   and early 1970s, as the field evidence mounted and as advances
         Flood,” thereby initiating the famous controversy. As he well   were made in understanding the physical processes of high-energy
         knew, the notion of catastrophic flooding directly challenged sub-  megaflooding, Bretz’s bold hypothesis came to be generally
         stantive and epistemological notions of uniformitarianism that   accepted by the geological community.
         were thought to underpin geology as a science. These uniformitar-  At age 97, in recognition for more than 70 years of scientific
         ian principles held that cataclysmic processes were unsuitable top-  achievements, J Harlen Bretz was honored with the 1979 Penrose
         ics for proper scientific investigation. To counter this presumption,   Medal of The Geological Society of America. In accepting, Bretz
         Bretz conducted extensive field investigations each summer, the   listed his major research accomplishment as follows: “Perhaps I
         results of which he meticulously detailed in more than a dozen   can be credited with reviving and demystifying legendary cata-
         major papers from 1923 to 1932.                       strophism and challenging a too rigorous uniformitarianism.”
          How was it that this outrageous hypothesis got published? In
         today’s culture of “publish or perish,” outrageous hypotheses tend   FURTHER READING
         to get soundly squelched within the secret rituals of peer review.   Baker,  V.R.,  2008,  The  Spokane  Flood  debates:  Historical  background  and
         Today’s younger scientists, wary of their h-index rankings, can be   philosophical perspective, in Grapes, R., Oldroyd, D., and Grigelis, A., eds.,
         reluctant to expend effort on topics that deviate from currently   History of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology: Geological Society,
                                                                London, Special Publication 301, p. 33–50.
         fashionable paths of inquiry. But Bretz had some advantages in   Soennichsen, J., 2008, Bretz’s flood: The remarkable story of a rebel geologist
         this regard. First, he became tenured shortly before he formulated   and the world’s greatest flood: Seattle, Washington, Sasquatch Books, 289 p.























                                                                                         www.geosociety.org/gsatoday  51
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56